Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ellice Y. HARRIS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Ellice Harris appeals a final administrative order affirming the Department of Children and Families' termination of her Work and Gain Economic Self-Sufficiency (WAGES) benefits 1 as a sanction for not complying with work requirements. There was competent, substantial evidence to support the Department's determination that Ms. Harris had not complied with her work requirements or provided adequate documentation from her physician to except her from a penalty for noncompliance with the work requirements. Thus, the Department properly imposed a level one sanction. See § 414.065(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997).2 We note that a level one sanction permits Ms. Harris to receive benefits once she complies with work requirements or presents adequate documentation of medical incapacity. See § 414.065(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997).
We strike from the final order, however, those provisions that find that the Department terminated Ms. Harris's benefits for failure to appear at an orientation program or appointment. The Department did not request the termination of benefits on this ground and did not present evidence to support this as a basis for termination. The only sanction properly imposed on Ms. Harris is a level one sanction pursuant to section 414.065(4)(a) for failure to comply with work requirements or to provide adequate documentation of medical incapacity to except her from noncompliance penalties pursuant to section 414.065(7)(b).
Affirmed as corrected.
FOOTNOTES
1. See § 414.015, Fla. Stat. (1997).
2. The Department initially sought a level two sanction. At the administrative hearing, however, the Department advised that it was seeking only a level one sanction. There is no additional documentation reflecting the Department's intention, however, and the final order does not clarify this.
PER CURIAM.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D99-3710.
Decided: July 07, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)