Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ernest MERIWEATHER, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
Ernest Meriweather appeals his convictions, and the State cross-appeals Meriweather's sentence. We affirm his convictions without discussion; however, his sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to include eighteen sentencing points for firearm possession.
Meriweather was convicted of felonious firearm possession (count I); battery on a law enforcement officer (count II); resisting arrest with violence (count III); possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (count IV); and possession of cocaine (count V). The guidelines scoresheet prepared at sentencing reflected a permissible range of 29.9 to 49.9 months' imprisonment; Meriweather was sentenced to 29.9 months on all counts. However, eighteen points were not assessed for his possession of a firearm during the commission of counts II, III and V.1 This eighteen-point assessment is mandatory for felonies which do not have firearm possession as an essential element.
We, therefore, remand for resentencing. On remand, Meriweather's new sentence must include eighteen points for firearm possession.
FOOTNOTES
1. Section 921.0014(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that if the offender is convicted of committing or attempting to commit any felony, other than those enumerated in section 775.087(2), while having in his or her possession a firearm, an additional eighteen sentence points are assessed. See also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(12) (eighteen additional sentence points shall be assessed where the defendant is convicted of committing or attempting to commit a felony while in possession of a firearm).
PER CURIAM.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98-00840.
Decided: August 06, 1999
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)