JULES v. STATE (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Joel JULES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-0605

Decided: July 10, 2024

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011) (“Since ‘no evidentiary hearing is allowed’ under [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure] 3.800(a), a claim of error that the petitioner can establish only by relying on facts that are not evident on the face of the record is a claim that cannot be adjudicated under that rule provision.” (quoting Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 242 (Fla. 2007))); Martinez v. State, 298 So. 3d 1196, 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (modification of a sentence after it has begun to be served does not violate double jeopardy where the defendant agreed to the modification).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network