Samuel Lester McCray, Jr., Appellant, v. Carol Lynn McCray, Appellee. (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Samuel Lester McCray, Jr., Appellant, v. Carol Lynn McCray, Appellee.

No. 1D2022-3876

Decided: July 03, 2024

Samuel Lester McCray, Jr., pro se, Appellant. Samuel Alexander of Alexander Appellate Law P.A., DeLand, for Appellee.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see also Lafaille v. Lafaille, 837 So. 2d 601, 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“Where an appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the record on appeal is so limited, ‘we must presume that there was sufficient evidence and testimony presented to the trial court to support its findings of fact.”) (quoting Damkohler v. Dahmkohler, 336 So. 2d 1243, 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)).

Per Curiam.

Lewis, Bilbrey, and Long, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network