Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mario E. Vazquez, Appellant, v. B & R Supermarket Inc., et al., Appellees.
Affirmed. See Ryals v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 722 So. 2d 845, 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (“[W]here a claimant does not challenge the sufficiency of the [referee's] findings, but only offers a different version of the facts, there is no legal error.”).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D24-0098
Decided: June 19, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)