Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., Appellant, v. Natasha Katherina Smith, Appellee. (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., Appellant, v. Natasha Katherina Smith, Appellee.

No. 3D23-1301

Decided: June 19, 2024

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

Samuel Lee Smith, Jr., in proper person. Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Ward v. Waters, 49 Fla. L. Weekly D72, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 3, 2024) (explaining that trial courts possess “substantial discretion in rendering decisions relating to the frequency, timing, duration, and conditions of timesharing” that “must be supported by a finding as to the best interests of the child”) (citing Talarico v. Talarico, 305 So. 3d 601, 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (explaining substantial discretion); and Davis v. Davis, 245 So. 3d 810, 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (explaining findings related to the best interests of the child)).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network