BRIDE v. STATE (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

David Carl BRIDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D2023-2476, 5D2023-2477, 5D2023-2478

Decided: June 14, 2024

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm without further discussion, the revocation of Appellant's probation following his admission to the violations and the resulting judgment and sentences imposed. We remand for the trial court to enter an amended order of revocation of probation in each of Appellant's cases listing the conditions of probation that the trial court found that Appellant had violated. See Murphy v. State, 612 So. 2d 676, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (remanding for entry of a written order of revocation stating the conditions of probation that were violated).

Affirmed; Remanded with directions.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Edwards, C.J., and Makar and Harris, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network