James Elton Roberts, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2024)

James Elton Roberts appeals his judgment and sentences, entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of three counts of battery of a facility employee by throwing, tossing, or expelling certain fluids or materials. Roberts raises two issues on appeal: (i) whether the State engaged in prosecutorial misconduct in its opening and closing arguments, and (ii) whether the trial court erred by imposing a $100 cost of prosecution.

We affirm as to the first issue without further comment. As for the second issue, Roberts insists that the trial court erred by imposing a $100 cost of prosecution sua sponte. As we have explained in Parks v. State, “the [$100] cost for the state attorney is a minimum cost that is mandated by subsection (8) and not an ‘investigative’ cost incurred by an agency, as described in § 938.27(1), which can only be imposed ‘if requested’ by the agency.” 371 So. 3d 392, 392–93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023), review granted, SC2023-1355, 2024 WL 370043 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2024). Thus, the trial court was within its authority to impose the cost of prosecution.

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Lewis, M.K. Thomas, and Nordby, JJ., concur.