FLEURIMOND v. STATE (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Augustin FLEURIMOND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D23-2181

Decided: June 05, 2024

Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

Clayton R. Kaeiser, P.A., and Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Miller v. State, 435 So. 2d 258, 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Desue v. State, 917 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); see also Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[A] traditional double jeopardy challenge attacks both the conviction and, by default, the sentence, while rule 3.800(a) is limited to claims that a sentence itself is illegal, without regard to the underlying conviction.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network