ZALAQUETT v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

William A. ZALAQUETT, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D23-1704

Decided: May 29, 2024

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.

Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellant. Kelley Kronenberg, and Danielle Spradley (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas as Tr. for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc. v. Harris, 264 So. 3d 186, 192-93 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (“On appeal, the Bank correctly argues that it was unnecessary for its witness to testify regarding his knowledge of the third-party vendor's mailing practices to establish that the demand letter had been sent․ [O]ur review of the record in this case leads us to conclude that sufficient evidence was presented to preclude an involuntary dismissal at the close of the Bank's case-in-chief on the issue of whether a prima facie showing was made that the demand letter was mailed to the borrower prior to the filing of the suit.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network