LAGANO v. STATE (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Tony John LAGANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D2023-3510

Decided: May 31, 2024

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm the trial court's order revoking Appellant's drug offender probation and the resulting judgment and sentences imposed. However, because the order inadvertently included a violation of Special Condition 39, which Appellant did not admit to violating and the State announced at the violation of probation hearing that it was not pursuing, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter an amended order of revocation of drug offender probation that does not include Special Condition 39 as one of the violated conditions of probation.

Affirmed; Remanded with directions.

FOOTNOTES

1. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Per Curiam.

Wallis, Lambert, and Eisnaugle, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network