Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Charles Lee MOULTRIE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Charles Lee Moultrie, Jr. appeals his judgment and sentence, which stems from the revocation of his probation for a new law violation. Moultrie argues the trial court erred in denying a dispositive motion to suppress, which led to the revocation, and in imposing a $100 cost under section 938.27(8), Florida Statutes, at sentencing. We affirm the judgment and sentence. Further, the trial court's imposition of the $100 cost under section 938.27(8) was mandatory, and therefore appropriate. See Parks v. State, 371 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023), review granted in Parks v. State of Florida, No. SC2023-1355, 2024 WL 370043 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2024).
Affirmed.
Per Curiam
Lewis, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D2022-1685
Decided: May 15, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)