GIL v. STATE (2024)

Affirmed. See Barron v. State, 217 So. 3d 1088, 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“Applying this fundamental rule of statutory construction, we hold that the trial court was authorized under the statute to ‘weigh and consider’ the State's competing evaluation in assessing whether [Appellant] met his burden of establishing probable cause.”); Abaunza v. State, 278 So. 3d 207, 210-11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“[O]ur standard of review limits us to determining whether the trial court's conclusion was supported by competent substantial evidence ․ We find that the trial court's ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence ․ We view the evidence as did the trial court, as falling short of establishing probable cause.”).

PER CURIAM.