Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Paula Andrea Carmona, Appellant, v. VQ Everglades Homes LLC, Appellee.
In this residential eviction case, appellant, Paula Andrea Carmona, the tenant, appeals from an order denying her motion to vacate a default final judgment of eviction rendered in favor of appellee, VQ Everglades Homes LLC, the landlord. In her verified motion, Carmona contended she was never served with the complaint and corroborated her allegations by appending a copy of the return of service reflecting she was served at an address other than that set forth in the complaint and final judgment. Because her unrebutted allegations, if proven by clear and convincing evidence, would establish that VQ Everglades failed to effectuate valid service of process, Carmona established, at a minimum, entitlement to an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we are constrained to reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Oshana v. Lopiano, 314 So. 3d 311, 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (finding trial court was required to hold evidentiary hearing on issues relating to service of process prior to rendering findings and denying motion to vacate final judgment); see also Travelers Ins. Co. v. Davis, 371 So. 2d 702, 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (reversing order quashing service of process and requiring evidentiary hearing to first determine validity of service of process); Linville v. Home Sav. of Am., FSB, 629 So. 2d 295, 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (concluding appellant was entitled to evidentiary hearing on motion to quash because allegations contained within motion would establish failure to effect valid service of process, as required by section 48.031, Florida Statutes).
Reversed and remanded.
MILLER, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D23-1272
Decided: May 01, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)