HEFLEY v. COLOMBO (2024)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aimee HEFLEY, Appellant, v. Lisa COLOMBO, Appellee.

No. 3D23-1391

Decided: May 01, 2024

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

William Hefley (Lake Mary), for appellant. Lisa Colombo (Hollywood), for appellee.

Affirmed. See Jordan v. Jordan, 601 So. 2d 287, 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“Where, as here, there was conflicting testimony on the matter in question, it was the responsibility of the trial judge to resolve the conflict. In re Estate of Zimmerman, 84 So. 2d 560, 561 (Fla. 1956); Hartnett v. Lotauro, 82 So. 2d 362, 364 (Fla. 1955). As the ruling is supported by substantial competent evidence, we affirm.”); Heasley v. Evans, 104 So. 2d 854, 857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958) (“An appellate court will not disturb the findings of fact and conclusions of law of a probate court in a will contest unless there is a lack of substantial competent evidence to support the findings or unless it is clearly manifested that the trial judge misapprehended the legal effect of the evidence in its entirety.”).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network