Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Minor Street, LP, Petitioner, v. Daniel L. Allen, et al., Respondents.
Upon consideration of Minor Street LP #1's Motion for Rehearing, we withdraw our February 21, 2024 opinion and substitute this opinion in its place. Minor Street appealed from an order denying its motion for appellate attorney's fees as sanctions rendered in the circuit court appellate division. Although this order was the first ruling on sanctions, it was addressed at oral argument by the circuit court appellate panel below and ruled on in the appellate division. Consequently, the order is properly reviewable under this Court's certiorari jurisdiction. See City of Miami Beach v. Deutzman, 180 So. 3d 245, 245-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (reviewing a circuit court appellate division order, which was the first ruling on the question of attorneys’ fees, under certiorari jurisdiction); United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Doctor Rehab Ctr., Inc., 121 So. 3d 66, 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (reviewing a circuit court appellate division's 57.105 fee order under certiorari jurisdiction); Comprehensive Health Ctr., LLC v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 99 So. 3d 525, 525 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“A petition for a writ of certiorari is the proper vehicle for review of the circuit court appellate division's denial of appellate attorney's fees.”).
We therefore treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See S. Florida Pain & Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 82 So. 3d 854 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (treating an appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari to review an order denying fees rendered by the circuit court appellate division). “A district court should exercise its discretion to grant certiorari review only when there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003). Because the circuit court appellate division did not violate a clearly established principle of law in denying the motion for sanctions, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.
Petition denied.
PER CURIAM.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 3D23-1050
Decided: May 01, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)