Jeffery Kenon, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2024)

Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we find no reversible error and affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 n.3 (Fla. 2003) (defining a scrivener's error as a written clerical error that is not the result of a “judicial determination or error”). Appellant agreed to a sentence of ten years in prison (with a five-year minimum mandatory term) followed by three years of sex offender probation. The court imposed the sentence as agreed. The written amended sentence correctly imposes the agreed-to sentence but then also states: “The defendant is adjudicated a prison releasee reoffender and has been sentenced to serve 100 percent of the court-imposed sentence in accordance with section 775.082(8)(B).” This language, if implemented, would require all ten years to be served day-for-day—contrary to the intention of the parties and the court. The written sentence should be corrected by deletion of the above-quoted language.

On remand, the lower tribunal shall correct this scrivener's error, consistent with this opinion. Appellant need not be present for this ministerial correction. See Walton v. State, 106 So. 3d 522, 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“[A] defendant need not be present at resentencing if the error to be corrected is ‘purely ministerial’ or clerical, and involves no exercise of the court's discretion.”).

Affirmed and Remanded for correction of scrivener's error.

Per Curiam.

B.L. Thomas, Ray, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.