Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John Calvin GERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
In German v. State, 284 So. 3d 572, 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019), this Court “reverse[d] the order on appeal and remand[ed] for the circuit court to reinstate its original order granting resentencing. The trial court should resentence appellant to a lawful sentence on remand, based on the controlling law at the time of resentencing.” The State neither sought rehearing nor review in the Florida Supreme Court.
On remand, the circuit court entered an order requiring resentencing pursuant to our mandate. Three years after the mandate issued, the resentencing had not occurred. So the State sought to take advantage of a subsequent decision from the Florida Supreme Court. The circuit court agreed and declined to follow our mandate in light of the new authority.
There is no doubt that the Florida Supreme Court's subsequent decision would have been advantageous to the State had it been issued in 2019. But the Florida Supreme Court's decision was not issued until years later. Instead, our mandate was this Court's judgment requiring the circuit court to carry out a resentencing. And, as to the original sentencing, “our judgment wiped the slate clean.” State v. Okafor, 306 So. 3d 930, 933 (Fla. 2020) (internal citation omitted); see also Morris v. State, 328 So. 3d 1127, 1128 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021). Our opinion and mandate clearly required the circuit court to “resentence appellant to a lawful sentence on remand, based on the controlling law at the time of resentencing.” German, 284 So. 3d at 573.
Contrary to the State's argument, the circuit court could not revive the original sentence unless we recalled our mandate. But, as the Florida Supreme Court has explained, we lack the authority to do so more than 120 days after the mandate issued. Okafor, 306 So. 3d at 933 (citing § 43.44, Fla. Stat. (2019) and Fla. R. App. P. 9.340(a)).
Based on the foregoing, we vacate the circuit court's order reinstating German's prior sentence and remand to the circuit court with instructions to comply with this Court's 2019 mandate.
Vacated and remanded.
Kuntz, J.
May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 4D2023-0118
Decided: March 27, 2024
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)