Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William J. NORKUNAS, individually, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida BUILDING COMMISSION, Wendy's International, Inc., and Interplan, LLC, Appellees.
William J. Norkunas appeals a final order of the Florida Building Commission (“FBC”) granting a requested waiver of the accessibility requirements of chapter 553, Florida Statutes. We dismiss the appeal for lack of standing.
Section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides for judicial review of administrative action and states that “[a] party who is adversely affected by final agency action is entitled to judicial review.” Thus, there are four requirements for standing to seek judicial review of final agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act: (1) the action is final; (2) the agency is subject to provisions of the act; (3) the person seeking review was a party to the action; and (4) the party was adversely affected by the action. See Legal Envtl. Assistance Found., Inc. v. Clark, 668 So.2d 982, 986 (Fla.1996). The first and second elements are not in dispute here. However, rather than being a “party” as the term is defined in section 120.52(12), Norkunas is in fact a member of the FBC, and cast the sole dissenting vote on the waiver application at issue. This circumstance obviously implicates the body of case law generally recognizing that a lower tribunal may not appeal its own order, but we need not consider whether a dissenting member of a collegial administrative tribunal may seek judicial review. Because appellant was not a party to the proceedings below, he is without standing to institute an appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM.
BROWNING, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D08-0739.
Decided: May 27, 2008
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)