Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Irene Johnson PRIDGEN and Karey Johnson, Sr., Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, aS OWNER TRUSTEE OF the RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES TRUST VII-A, Appellee.
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(f) states that “during the pendency of a review of a nonfinal order ․ the lower tribunal may not render a final order disposing of the cause pending such review absent leave of the court.” Here, without leave of court, the trial court entered a final judgment of foreclosure while a prior appeal in the case was pending. The appellants argue that this was error, and we agree.
“It has long been held that where an appeal is duly taken, ․ jurisdiction of the cause is transferred to the appellate court, thereby depriving the trial court of the power to [f]inally dispose of the cause by dismissal or otherwise.” Benjamin v. Fore, 995 So. 2d 543, 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (alteration in original) (quoting De La Portilla v. De La Portilla, 304 So. 2d 116, 118 (Fla. 1974)); see also Gibson v. Progress Bank of Fla., 54 So. 3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Kessler v. City of Naples, 779 So. 2d 378, 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). According to the appellee, the trial court retained this power because the prior appeal sought review of a nonappealable nonfinal order. It's true that the nonfinal order was not appealable. But this does not mean that we lacked jurisdiction to make that determination in the prior appeal, nor does it mean that the trial court retained jurisdiction to finally dispose of the case while the appeal was pending. See Katz v. NME Hosps., Inc., 791 So. 2d 1127, 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Carter v. Dorman, 385 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Because an appeal was pending when the trial court entered final judgment, the judgment is void. See Benjamin, 995 So. 2d at 544. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate the final judgment.1
Reversed and remanded.
FOOTNOTES
1. Because the judgment is void, we decline to reach the merits of the other issues the appellants raise in this appeal.
LABRIT, Judge.
KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 2D22-2588
Decided: December 27, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)