Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DDD CONSTRUCTION & SITE WORK, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, DANNY DAVIS, individually, and TOMMY DAVIS, individually, Petitioners, v. Weseman Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Respondent.
The Court dismisses the petition for writ of prohibition as facially insufficient.
Additionally, this opinion shall serve as a warning to all of those who practice before this Court against filing cases or case documentation as an emergency unless a true emergency exists. The warning applies to both counsel and pro se filers. When an individual selects the emergency box in the courts’ e-filing system, or titles their filing as an emergency, whether during working hours or after hours and on weekends, an important chain of events is triggered which utilizes significant time and judicial resources. First, the Clerk of the Court receives notification of an emergency and must immediately review and formally receive the filing. The Clerk then alerts the director of central staff who also must review the filing and make a determination whether emergent circumstances may exist. If so, or if it is unclear, the director alerts the panel of three judges on call for emergencies. Those three judges must then review the case and filing. The director of central staff or a staff attorney reviews and researches the case creating a case summary for the sitting emergency panel. The emergency panel reviews the summary, the case in its entirety, and the pertinent legal authority before conferencing the case to determine the outcome of the emergency.
If an emergency is filed during working hours, time is expended on the emergency by the judges, the Clerk of the Court, and central staff and away from pending cases. If an emergency is filed after hours or on holidays and weekends, significant family time is taken from the members of the Court. The Court and its employees remain willing and able to serve the State of Florida and, thus, often work after hours and on holidays and weekends when the need arises, either from an emergency filing or otherwise. The emergency option is not taken lightly by the Court, nor should it be utilized without proper thought and consideration by any counsel or pro se filer. If an individual exhibits continued improper use of the emergency filing option, this may result in the imposition of sanctions.
Per Curiam.
Lewis, Roberts, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 1D2023-2885
Decided: December 06, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)