Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Century Park Condominium No. 2 Association, Inc., Appellee.
In this Hurricane Irma-related lawsuit, appellant, Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company, challenges an order compelling the appraisal of a claim filed by appellee, Century Park Condominium No. 2 Association, Inc. The trial court ordered the unresolved coverage determination and appraisal to proceed on a dual-track basis. Consistent with our decision in Sunshine State Ins. Co. v. Rawlins, 34 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), we impute no abuse of discretion in this approach. The trial court preserved the insurer's defenses to coverage, while simultaneously paving the way for a relatively expeditious and cost-effective decision as to the amount of loss. Id. at 754–55; see also Paradise Plaza Condo. Ass'n v. Reinsurance Corp. of N.Y., 685 So. 2d 937, 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (concluding dual-track approach avoids “adverse effects on the expeditious, out of court disposition of litigation” and saves “judicial resources which might otherwise be required in resolving the factual and legal issues involved in [coverage disputes]”); Castle Key Ins. Co. v. Wooden Fam. Tr., 321 So. 3d 346, 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“[The] motions were reasonable under the circumstances, [and the] participation in the litigation did not imply a voluntary and intentional relinquishment of [a] contractual right to compel an appraisal ․”); Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Branco, 148 So. 3d 488, 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (noting that lawsuit to establish coverage after coverage has been denied is not action inconsistent with right to appraisal because appraisal need not be sought prior to litigation). Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.
Affirmed.
MILLER, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D2022-1489
Decided: October 18, 2023
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)