DOLL v. STATE (2023)

Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence entered against her for misdemeanor domestic battery, arguing the trial court erred by (1) denying her motion for judgment of acquittal, and (2) signing a sentencing order containing a scrivener's error imposing $100 as cost of prosecution after the trial court announced at sentencing the cost of prosecution would be $50. We affirm as to the first issue without discussion. As the State concedes error on the second issue, we reverse and remand for the trial court to perform the ministerial act of entering a corrected written sentence which reduces the cost of prosecution from $100 to the statutory minimum of $50.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Per Curiam.

Ciklin, Levine and Conner, JJ., concur.