Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PHOENIX INSURANCE CO., etc., Petitioner, v. TRANS WORLD FORWARDING, INC., Respondent.
Phoenix Insurance Company petitions for a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order requiring blanket production of documents. We grant the petition, finding that the ordered production violates the essential requirements of law for which there is no adequate remedy on appeal. Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987).
Here, as in Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 960 So.2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), we find that Trans World is not entitled at this juncture to many of the numerous categories of documents it seeks. Discovery directed to an insurer's business practices and alleged statutory bad faith is premature “unless there has been a determination of liability and extent of damages owed the insured under the first-party insurance policy.” Id. at 795 (citation omitted). No determination regarding coverage and damages has been made in this case. Hence, any document requests directed to matters outside Trans World's claim, the circumstances of alleged loss, and the policies at issue, are premature.
Trans World should not have been ordered to produce privileged and work product documents included within requests 28, 30, and 34. Phoenix must, however, prepare and serve a privilege log to preserve any such claims.
The petition is granted and the order under review is quashed. On remand, the trial court shall consider the items sought to be discovered and shall enter an order permitting, and prohibiting discovery in accordance with this opinion.
Certiorari granted, order quashed; remanded with instructions.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D09-1344.
Decided: September 23, 2009
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)