Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
J.R., As Mother of T.R., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Section 39.809(5), Florida Statutes (1999) requires a trial court to enter a written order with findings of fact and conclusions of law when terminating parental rights. In this case, the Department of Children and Families concedes that the order terminating J.R.'s parental rights as to T.R., her minor child, is deficient because it fails to make specific findings of fact. We must vacate the order and direct the trial court on remand to comply with section 39.809(5).
Additionally, the trial court's oral pronouncements at the termination hearing do not conform to its written order. The written order indicates that termination resulted in part from failure to comply with a case plan pursuant to Florida Statutes, section 39.806(1)(e). However, oral pronouncement indicated that J.R.'s rights were being terminated pursuant to section 39.806(1)(c) and (i). These subsections provide that termination is proper “[w]hen the parent ․ engages in conduct toward the child or toward other children that demonstrate that the continuing involvement of the parent ․ in the parent-child relationship threatens the life, safety, well-being, or physical, mental or emotional health of the child irrespective of the provision of services” or if parental rights have been terminated as to a child's sibling. It is clear from the record that termination was proper under section 39.806(1)(c) and (i). Therefore, we direct the trial court to remedy the inconsistency upon remand.
We find that J.R.'s remaining arguments are without merit.
ORDER VACATED; REMANDED.
PER CURIAM.
COBB, PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 5D00-1789.
Decided: December 22, 2000
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)