BOLTRI v. SINGLETARY (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.

Frank J. BOLTRI, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., et al., Respondents.

No. 98-3492

Decided: February 15, 1999

Petitioner pro se. No appearance for Respondents.

Because petitioner has not demonstrated that the circuit court failed to afford him due process of law or departed from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition. See Sheley v. State, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).

The proper remedy to correct a sentencing error is with the sentencing court, not a petition for writ of mandamus against the Florida Parole Commission and Department of Corrections. See Boyd v. State, 538 So.2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

PER CURIAM.

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network