Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Alphonso GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Alphonso Griffin (Griffin) appeals his sentence, arguing that his sentence reflects a scoresheet error. We reverse for resentencing.
Griffin pleaded guilty to two counts of felony petit theft, resisting a merchant, and simple battery, as charged. Griffin committed these crimes on September 1, 1997, in Columbia County. The trial court sentenced Griffin to 26.25 months in prison for the felony petit thefts, and to time served on the misdemeanors, scoring a 1984 conviction as a level 7 offense, over Griffin's objection.
Griffin's 1984 conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer while armed should have been scored as a level 5 offense, as the State correctly concedes. (Battery on a law enforcement officer while armed is a violation of section 784.07, Florida Statutes (1983). Section 921.0012(3), Florida Statutes (1997), lists a violation of 784.07(2)(b) as a level 4 offense. Section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1997), directs that when an offense is reclassified because of the use of a firearm, it is, for purposes of sentencing, “ranked one level above the ranking under s. 921.0012 or s. 921.0013 of the felony offense committed.”).
The error placed Griffin in a sentencing range of 26.25 to 43.75 months in prison; the correct range is 18.45 months to 30.75 months in prison. This court holds that if a sentencing error places a defendant in a harsher sentencing category than he would have occupied on a correctly calculated scoresheet, then remand for resentencing on a correctly calculated scoresheet is required. Yarrell v. State, 680 So.2d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Accordingly, we reverse Griffin's sentence and remand for resentencing on a correctly calculated scoresheet.
PER CURIAM.
BARFIELD, C.J., LAWRENCE and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98-1978
Decided: February 18, 1999
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,First District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)