BROCKLEY v. STATE (1997)

District Court of Appeal of Florida,Second District.

Rodney BROCKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-4430.

Decided: June 27, 1997

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

The defendant, Rodney Brockley, appeals his convictions for lewd assault and first degree burglary with assault or battery. We affirm his convictions without comment, but we are compelled to strike one condition of probation.

Condition thirteen requires the defendant to “waive extradition should a violation of supervision occur.” We strike this condition because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced. See McDaniels v. State, 679 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The defendant asserts that conditions four and twelve must also be stricken for the same reason. We disagree. Conditions four and twelve are verbatim quotes from the form order of probation added to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.986. Pursuant to State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996), we affirm the imposition of these conditions of probation.

We, therefore, strike condition thirteen. Otherwise, we affirm the convictions and sentences.

PER CURIAM.

THREADGILL, C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network