Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maria Elena BURNAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Maria Elena Burnam seeks a writ of habeas corpus. Burnam was arrested on July 17, 2003 and subsequently charged by information with trafficking in cocaine. She appeared for a pretrial probable cause hearing on July 18, 2003, in accordance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.133(a)(1). The presiding judge found no probable cause, but allowed the State an additional 48 hours to submit an affidavit in support of probable cause and established a $10,000 bond. On July 20, 2003, a second probable cause hearing was held by a different judge who found probable cause and established a $50,000 bond without any additional information provided by the State.
Rule 3.133(a)(1) requires that a defendant in custody be afforded a probable cause determination within 48 hours of arrest. The 48-hour period may be extended for not more than two 24-hour periods after a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Rule 3.133(a)(4) provides that if probable cause is not found or the specified times are not complied with, the defendant shall be released from custody unless an information or indictment has been filed in which event the defendant shall be released on her own recognizance subject to certain conditions.
We interpret rule 3.133(a)(1) to require the judge conducting the initial pretrial probable cause hearing to select one of three actions: (1) find probable cause, (2) find no probable cause, or (3) continue the hearing for one or two 24-hour periods to allow the state to supplement the facts in support of a finding of probable cause. At the second hearing the State expressly informed the court that it had no further information to offer.
Because the judge at the first hearing found no probable cause, we grant the petition, issue the writ and remand with instructions to the trial court to release the defendant upon her own recognizance since an information has been filed against her.
PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.
PETERSON, J.
SHARP, W., and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 5D03-2654.
Decided: September 19, 2003
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fifth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)