Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Eldred LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We deny the state's motion for rehearing, but withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following revised opinion.
Eldred Lewis was convicted of robbery following a jury trial and was sentenced to a thirty-year prison term. He timely appealed his conviction and sentence. The public defender filed both a motion to withdraw and a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there were no arguable issues for appeal. We found the record on appeal to be insufficient to allow the type of independent appellate review required by In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), and on February 10, 2000, we ordered the record supplemented with the missing transcripts and pleadings.
After entering numerous additional orders to supplement the record, several crucial transcripts remained missing. This court relinquished jurisdiction to the circuit court on January 24, 2001, for the purpose of conducting a proceeding to determine whether a complete record could be either obtained or reconstructed. A supplemental record was filed, but the record on appeal remains incomplete.
Without the missing transcript, this court cannot fulfill its obligation to conduct a complete and independent review of the record as required by Anders. See Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462 (Fla.1977)(missing portions of the record prevented the supreme court from conducting the complete review required in death penalty cases). We reverse Lewis' conviction and sentence. Since the transcript of the hearing on Lewis' pretrial motion to suppress is incomplete, the circuit court must also conduct a new hearing on that motion.
PER CURIAM.
FARMER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 4D99-1772.
Decided: November 14, 2001
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida,Fourth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)