Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Patrick Michael Craig, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.
Patrick Michael Craig appeals his judgment and sentences following an order of probation that imposed a sentence of sixty months to be served concurrently for two third-degree felony (F3)1 charges in two separate cases.
At sentencing, the trial court orally pronounced that credit for time served for the associated misdemeanor charges would be awarded in both cases. The clerk's notes and the trial court's signature page in both cases reflected that Craig was to receive credit for time served. However, the written sentencing order and the order of probation did not reflect that Craig was awarded credit for time served for his felony charges. Craig moved the trial court to correct his sentences pending appeal, but since the trial court did not rule within sixty days, the motion was deemed denied. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B).
On appeal, Craig argues that the omission of credit for time served in the written order of probation and sentences resulted in an illegal sentence that—when combined with the 60 months of probation—exceeded the statutory five-year maximum. The State concedes that Craig's sentences must be corrected on the basis that the written sentences and the order of probation did not conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement.
Under either rationale, a correction is required. See Campbell v. State, 380 So. 3d 1292, 1293 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024) (citing Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 2003) (“[W]hen conflict arises between the written sentence and the oral pronouncement, the oral pronouncement prevails.”)); Grissinger v. State, 905 So. 2d 982, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that trial court must award credit for time served in jail awaiting trial against probation term so that combined time does not exceed statutory maximum) (citing Baldwin v. State, 558 So. 2d 173, 174 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)); see generally State v. Summers, 642 So. 2d 742, 744 (Fla. 1994) (discussing consideration of time served when imposing probation to ensure statutory maximum is not exceeded). Accordingly, the trial court's written judgment and sentences and the order of probation are reversed and remanded to conform with the oral pronouncement to reflect credit for time served.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
FOOTNOTES
1. Statutory maximum for a third-degree felony is five years. See § 775.082(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2024).
KAMOUTSAS, J.
BROWNLEE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case No. 6D2025-0699
Decided: June 05, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)