Carlyne Desir and Flint Edwards, Appellants, v. BMO (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.

Carlyne Desir and Flint Edwards, Appellants, v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 6D2025-2361

Decided: October 02, 2026

Carlyne Desir and Flint Edwards, Riverview, Pro Se. Kevin P. Robinson, Bradley J. Anderson, and Austin A. Esposito, of Zimmerman, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

We lack jurisdiction to review any orders or judgments entered before the trial court's September 2025 post-final-judgment enforcement order involving the surrender of collateral because Appellants did not timely challenge them. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). We otherwise affirm. See Duest v. Dugger, 555 So. 2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) (“The purpose of an appellate brief is to present arguments in support of the points on appeal. Merely making reference to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve issues, and these claims are deemed to have been waived.”).

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

PER CURIAM.

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network