E. G., Appellant, v. L. D., Appellee. (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.

E. G., Appellant, v. L. D., Appellee.

Case Nos. 6D2025-2238, 6D2025-2584

Decided: August 14, 2026

E. G., Green Mountain, North Carolina, pro se. L. D., Port Charlotte, pro se.

AFFIRMED. See Polyglycoat Corp. v. Hirsch Distribs., Inc., 442 So. 2d 958, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (“When points, positions, facts and supporting authorities are omitted from the brief, a court is entitled to believe that such are waived, abandoned, or deemed by counsel to be unworthy.”); Walker v. Est. of Yee, 376 So. 3d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (applying Polyglycoat principles to a pro se litigant's brief). See also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

PER CURIAM.

STARGEL, SMITH and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network