Kenneth Baldwin, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.

Kenneth Baldwin, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 6D2024-1955

Decided: July 24, 2026

Kenneth Baldwin, Bushnell, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

We affirm the trial court's order denying Appellant's amended motion to correct sentence without prejudice to Appellant's filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion in the trial court to correct the scrivener's error mistakenly referencing the entry of a no contest plea to Count II. See Freeman v. State, 415 So. 3d 923, 923 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“We decline to reach the merits of Freeman's additional claim that the revocation order contains a scrivener's error because that claim is not preserved for our review and does not constitute fundamental error.” (citing Thomas v. State, 725 So. 2d 1148, 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998))); Jones v. State, 413 So. 3d 839, 839-40 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024) (finding scrivener's error issue preserved because it was first raised via a rule 3.800(b) motion).

AFFIRMED without prejudice.

WOZNIAK, J.

MIZE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network