BOGGS v. REVENUE (2023)

Christopher Boggs appeals the child support award entered after a hearing before the Division of Administrative Hearings.¹ Mr. Boggs alleges that he is unable to afford the child support ordered below and asks this Court to lower his payments.

We are unable to afford Mr. Boggs the relief he seeks. A Final Administrative Support Order was entered by an Administrative Law Judge. That order made the requisite findings of fact as to Mr. Boggs's net income; imputed income to the child's grandmother, who is the child's guardian and caregiver; determined the monthly childcare costs; and computed child support under the Florida Child Support Guidelines. The court also provided a credit to Mr. Boggs in the amount of $444.08 as he is currently caring for another minor child.

There is no error on the face of the final order, and there is no transcript of the proceedings. Mr. Boggs has not met his burden of establishing reversible error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Macias v. Dep't of Revenue, 16 So. 3d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023.

PER CURIAM.

COHEN and WHITE, JJ., and SASSO, M.L., Associate Judge, concur.