DANFORTH v. DANFORTH (2023)

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.¹ See Lanson v. Reid, 314 So. 3d 279, 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“A motion seeking to vacate a final judgment does not change the order's finality.”); Talley v. Canal Indem. Co., 558 So. 2d 1088, 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (Anstead, J., concurring specially) (“Litigants should be on notice that they must appeal orders denying motions under rule 1.540 within 30 days or be barred from appellate review.”); New Day Miami, LLC v. Beach Devs., LLC, 225 So. 3d 372, 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“Rule 9.130(a)(5) expressly provides that rehearing motions directed towards orders on motions seeking relief from judgment do not toll rendition of such orders.”); Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(4) (“Orders disposing of motions for rehearing ․ are not reviewable separately from a review of the final order[.]”).

DISMISSED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023

PER CURIAM.

SASSO, C.J., and STARGEL and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.