Quintavis Jaquan Wilson, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

AFFIRMED. See State v. Simpson, 414 So. 3d 291, 297 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (“We have no occasion to address [whether the smell of cannabis alone is sufficient to establish probable cause] because this case does not involve smell alone.”); State v. Fortin, 383 So. 3d 820, 823-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (“In the instant case, we do not need to decide whether the smell of fresh marijuana alone gives an officer probable cause to search a vehicle, because in addition to the plain smell of fresh marijuana, the officer saw in plain view, ․ uncontained flakes of marijuana.”); Lincoln v. State, 398 So. 3d 1156, 1160 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024) (“Generally, to raise a claimed error on appeal, a litigant must object ․ when the alleged error occurs.”); Morrow v. State, 397 So. 3d 1205, 1208 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (“Morrow did not preserve this argument by contemporaneous objection at the revocation hearing ․”).

PER CURIAM.

NARDELLA, SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.