HAWRYCH v. VON BERG LLC (2026)

Dr. Andrew Hawrych appeals the trial court's partial summary judgment on four counts of his six-count complaint against Peter and Yvonne Von Berg, Chaz Hatfield, Lindy Hatfield Zinser, and Nutra-Luxe, M.D., LLC. We affirm the trial court's judgment on the claims against Yvonne Von Berg, Chaz Hatfield, and Lindy Hatfield Zinser without further comment because it is final as to those parties. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) (stating that district courts of appeal have jurisdiction to review partial final judgment if it “disposes of an entire case as to any party”). We dismiss the remainder of this appeal against Peter Von Berg and Nutra-Luxe, though, because the claims that remain outstanding before the trial court involve the same parties and are not separate and distinct from the claims pending on appeal. See Almacenes El Globo De Quito, S.A. v. Dalbeta L.C., 181 So. 3d 559, 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“Rule 9.110(k) provides for appellate jurisdiction to hear a partial final judgment only when the claims adjudicated by that order are separate and independent from the portion of the case still to be adjudicated.” (citations omitted)); Homeowners Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. Fraser, 346 So. 3d 228, 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“The decree and related order on appeal resolve only the declaratory judgment count, leaving other related counts relying on the same factual nexus unresolved.”).

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

PER CURIAM.

TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and GANNAM, JJ., concur.