Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James S. Nevinski, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.
James S. Nevinski appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after a jury trial. The State concedes that the conviction for unlawful use of a two-way communication device (Count 3) violates double jeopardy. We accept the State's concession of error, reverse the conviction on Count 3, and remand for the trial court to vacate that conviction. Otherwise, we affirm without further discussion.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.
PER CURIAM.
WHITE, MIZE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Case No. 6D2023-2587
Decided: September 05, 2025
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)