GONZALEZ v. STATE (2025)

Ana Luisa Gonzalez appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to suppress, arguing that the affidavit leading to the search warrant in question was deficient as a matter of law because it was witnessed by a law enforcement officer who was “a party to the underlying transaction” in violation of section 117.107(12), Florida Statutes, which prohibits a notary public from notarizing a signature on a document if the notary “has a financial interest in or is a party to the underlying transaction.” We find this argument unavailing for two reasons. First, the officer who witnessed the search warrant affidavit did not do so as a notary and, thus, the prohibition in section 117.107(12) did not preclude the officer from witnessing the affidavit. Second, even if the officer was acting as a notary, Gonzalez's broad interpretation of the phrase “underlying transaction” ignores “all the textual and structural clues that bear on the meaning of [the] disputed text.” Conage v. United States, 346 So. 3d 594, 598 (Fla. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted).

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, J.

STARGEL and MIZE, JJ., concur.