GIBSON v. DANIELS (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Sixth District.

Michael GIBSON, Appellant, v. Joseph DANIELS, Appellee.

Case No. 6D2025-0752

Decided: June 12, 2026

David L. Perkins and John B. Agnetti, of Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti, P.A., North Miami Beach, for Appellant. Megan G. Colter and Thomas A. Valdez, of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, and Kathleen MacMillan and Stevie Baker, of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

AFFIRMED. See, e.g., Portner v. Koppel, 382 So. 3d 742, 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (“Competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that appellant's former counsel had clear and unequivocal authority from appellant to settle the case ․”); Albert v. Am. Fam. Ins. Co., 739 F. App'x 607, 610 n.2 (11th Cir. 2018) (“In deciding a motion to enforce a settlement agreement (as with a motion for summary judgment) a court may consider the documents, affidavits, depositions and other evidence in the record to determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

PER CURIAM.

MIZE, BROWNLEE and PRATT, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network