Skip to main content


District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

IN RE:  MICHAEL JOSEPH MASON, Petitioner.  Bar Registration

No. 11–BG–1156

Decided: October 20, 2011


BEFORE:  Blackburne–Rigsby and Thompson, Associate Judges, and Newman, Senior Judge.

On consideration of Bar Counsel's report regarding petitioner's petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14


affidavit on June 24, 2005 and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner's petition for reinstatement is granted;  however, reinstatement is conditioned on various conditions listed below.   The conditions agreed to by petitioner include:


successful completion of the mandatory Continuing Legal Education class required of all new admittees within a year of reinstatement;


successful completion of twelve hours of Continuing Legal Education in the subject area of criminal law, criminal procedure and evidence within one year of reinstatement;  and,


consultation with the District of Columbia Bar's Practice Management Advisory Service prior to reentry into private practice and the execution of a waiver of confidentiality to permit Bar Counsel to obtain information on compliance.   In addition, pursuant to our authority, see D.C. Bar R. XI § 16


, this court imposes an additional condition that petitioner remain in compliance with his post-release supervision imposed by the state of Virginia and execute the necessary waivers of confidentiality required for Bar Counsel to obtain information on petitioner's compliance.   It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Michael Joseph Mason, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia subject to the conditions outlined above.   Failure to fully comply with the above conditions may result in revocation of this reinstatement order.   See D.C. Bar R. XI § 16




Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

Docket No: No. 11–BG–1156

Decided: October 20, 2011

Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard