IN RE: JOHN VENUTI (2011)

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

IN RE: JOHN VENUTI, Respondent. Bar Registration

No. 11–BG–517

Decided: June 23, 2011

ORDER

BEFORE: Blackburne–Rigsby, Associate Judge, Nebeker and King, Senior Judges.

On consideration of the certified order from the Maryland Court of Appeal suspending respondent for six months, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Venuti, 17 A.3d 143

Md.2011

, this court's May 13, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent filed his affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14

on May 19, 2011, it is

ORDERED that John Venuti, Esquire is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months, nunc pro tunc to May 19, 2011. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198

D.C.2007

and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165

D.C.2006

rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network