Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald GREEN, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
On consideration of the report of the Board on Professional Responsibility dated July 29, 1996, that Respondent violated the following rules of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct, D.C. Bar R.App.A: Rule 1.1(a) (failure to provide competent representation to client); Rule 1.3(a) (failure to represent client zealously and diligently within the bounds of the law); Rule 1.3(b)(1) (failure to seek the lawful objective of client); Rule 1.3(b)(2) (prejudicing or damaging client during the course of the professional relationship); Rule 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed, failure to reply promptly to client's requests for information, and failure to explain matters sufficiently to client to make informed decisions regarding representation); and Rule 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice), all of which occurred during the course of Green's representation of a single client; and in further consideration of his subsequent refusal to cooperate with Bar Counsel, it is
ORDERED that respondent is hereby suspended for 30 days from the practice of law in this jurisdiction based upon respondent's decision not to take exception to the recommendation of the Board, “effective thirty days after entry” of the order. D.C.Bar R. XI § 14(f).
The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chair of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI § 14, which sets forth certain rights and responsibilities of suspended attorneys.
PER CURIAM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 96-BG-1011.
Decided: January 30, 1997
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)