Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Paul Butler v. Amy Butler
ORDER
The parties appeared before the undersigned on October 7, 2013 to argue the defendant's motion for contempt. Both parties were ordered to submit written closing arguments and proposed findings of fact.
The plaintiff filed its document dated October 18, 2013. The defendant filed its document dated October 25, 2013, which did not provide specific proposed findings of facts but rather, baldly concluded that there is “a balance due of $25,614.16.”
The court requires a specific figure by figure summary of how the defendant concludes that the sum of $25,614.16 is due.
BY THE COURT
Kenneth L. Shluger, Judge
Shluger, Kenneth L., J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: FA084009331S
Decided: December 31, 2013
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)