Marie Wilson v. Alexandra Velez et al. (2011)

Superior Court of Connecticut.

Marie Wilson v. Alexandra Velez et al.

FSTCV044001206S

Decided: December 01, 2011

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO STRIKE # 251 AND THE OBJECTION THERETO # 264

The facts as pleaded are to be construed in the most favorable way for the plaintiff. Pleadings are to be construed broadly and realistically, rather than narrow or technically. This is the fourth revised complaint. Taking the complaint as a whole, and all of the counts as pleaded, they are sufficient to survive a motion to strike except Count Seventeen, Negligent Infliction of a Emotional Distress which is stricken.

SO ORDERED.

EDWARD R. KARAZIN, JR.

JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE

Karazin, Edward R., J.T.R.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network