Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Edmond P. Crumb v. Leon A. Burch et al.
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON CLAIM FOR DETERMINATION OF INTERESTS
The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant Concrete Crafters of Connecticut, Inc., in the current amount of $93,558.19. The plaintiff has served executions on J.P. Morgan Chase Bank (“Chase”), with which the defendant business customer and in which the defendant is a depositor. Chase has filed a claim for determination of interests in the defendant's accounts and any other property covered by a security interest granted to it by the defendant in 2001. As to Concrete Crafters, Chase has produced the following:
1) a Business Revolving Credit Account Agreement;
2) a Financing Statement (UCC-1) filed on April 16, 2001, signed by Leon Burch, President of Concrete Crafters, and countersigned by a representative of Chase, acknowledging a security interest to Chase;
3) a report from the Connecticut Secretary of the State reflecting continuations of the UCC-1 filing statement to the present time;
4) the actual Security Agreement between Concrete Crafters and Chase, dated April 3, 2001, signed by Leon Burch, President of Concrete Crafters, and countersigned by a representative of Chase.
The effect of these documents is to establish a superior interest in Chase of all of the defendant's property, because the defendant granted such an interest to Chase earlier in time to the interest that the plaintiff now asserts as a result of the executions in aid of its judgment against the defendant.
Because the plaintiff has not-and perhaps cannot-perfect a security interest in any of the defendant's property that is superior to that asserted by Chase, this court finds that the current priority of interests is in favor of Chase as against the plaintiff as to all of the defendant's property.
Accordingly the plaintiff shall release any such property of the defendant that it may have caused to be seized; and the court modifies such turnover orders as have issued so far to reflect that the plaintiff has an interest inferior to that of Chase as of this date.
Patty Jenkins Pittman, Judge
Pittman, Patty Jenkins, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: HHBCV095011381
Decided: October 29, 2010
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)