Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
City of Stamford v. First National Joint Ventury-0 Canal Street
RULING ON MOTION TO REARGUE AND/OR ALTER TERMS OF THE JUDGMENT
The City's motion to reargue is denied. The court declines to alter the judgment at this time. However, the court articulates what should be readily apparent to both sides, that the court found the value of the premises before the taking to be $8,250,000 less $77,800 or $8,172,200 and the value after the taking to be $7,290,000. It is also plainly obvious that the City will receive credit for the $170,000 already paid.
The court declines to alter the judgment further to include interest and expert fees in the absence of a motion for supplemental judgment and accompanying memorandum of law. Such motion shall be filed within two weeks. Any opposition shall be filed within one week thereafter.
BY THE COURT
A. WILLIAM MOTTOLESE, J.T.R.
Mottolese, A. William, J.T.R.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: FSTCV054004778S
Decided: August 25, 2010
Court: Superior Court of Connecticut.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)