Robert J. Trez v. International Water Safety Foundation et al (2010)

Superior Court of Connecticut.

Robert J. Trez v. International Water Safety Foundation et al

FSTCV085008779

Decided: July 20, 2010

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE RULING ON MOTION TO REARGUE AND FOR RECONSIDERATION (127.00)

The motion for reargument has been carefully considered, and it is denied. Contrary to the argument of defendants Case and P & C, this court did not hold that collateral estoppel did not apply because Case and P & C were not parties to the arbitration. Rather, it held that collateral estoppel was not available because there was not sufficient privity between Case and P & C on one hand, and the insurers on the other.

The other contentions in the motion are unpersuasive.

TAGGART D. ADAMS

SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE

Adams, Taggart D., J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network