NEAL LOEPPKY v. ELIZABETH KLASSEN LOEPPKY (2016)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland.

NEAL LOEPPKY, Appellant v. ELIZABETH KLASSEN LOEPPKY, Appellee

No. 11-16-00224-CV

Decided: November 03, 2016

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In response to this court's October 20, 2016 letter in which we questioned the jurisdiction of this court over the matter presented in this appeal, Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant agrees that this court does not have jurisdiction to consider this matter in a direct appeal. We note that Appellant has now filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in our Cause No. 11-16-00322-CV to address the matter that he originally attempted to raise by way of appeal. As a result, Appellant states that there is no need to maintain this appeal, and he requests that we dismiss it. In accordance with Appellant's request, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network